RelayRank Real AI relay testing and risk guides
避坑指南 深度评测

Relay top-up pitfalls: low price is not low risk

New relay users are often attracted by low multipliers or bonus balances. Long-term experience depends more on stability, model coverage, billing rule...

New relay users are often attracted by low multipliers or bonus balances. Long-term experience depends more on stability, model coverage, billing rules, incident handling, and refunds.

Current monitored examples such as YunDou, lingxicode, SudoCode, infai, toproutercn, right are useful for comparison, but top-up rules must still be checked on provider sites.

Four checks

Check supported models, pricing rules, status communication, and refund or dispute paths.

If a provider has only a payment page but no status notes or contact path, reduce trust.

Recommended strategy

Start small, test real tasks, compare transparency, and keep a backup endpoint. The best relay is not the cheapest one; it is the one you can verify.

相关推荐

查看全部文章 →
服务商入口

你的中转站也想被用户看见?

提交收录后,我们会按可用率、延迟、模型覆盖、价格透明度和风险信号进行观察,让用户用数据做选择。

提交收录 →