RelayRank Real AI relay testing and risk guides
榜单解读 深度评测

2026-06 OpenAI/Codex relay ranking

OpenAI/Codex relay selection should consider model availability, context continuity, tool-call stability, and cost control. This ranking is based on 1...

OpenAI/Codex relay selection should consider model availability, context continuity, tool-call stability, and cost control.

This ranking is based on 10 recent RelayRank monitoring samples, comparing availability, latency, current status, listing age, and traceable trends.

Current top providers

YunDou: 100% availability, 2011 ms average latency, current status up.

lingxicode: 99.8% availability, 2334 ms average latency, current status up.

SudoCode: 99.1% availability, 2249 ms average latency, current status up.

toproutercn: 98.9% availability, 2056 ms average latency, current status up.

aimz: 98.9% availability, 2391 ms average latency, current status up.

How to read it

This is not a top-up recommendation or a permanent verdict. Use it as a first screening layer before running small real-task tests.

Claude Code, Codex, Gemini, and Agent workflows should put sustained availability and status volatility ahead of one-off latency.

相关推荐

查看全部文章 →
服务商入口

你的中转站也想被用户看见?

提交收录后,我们会按可用率、延迟、模型覆盖、价格透明度和风险信号进行观察,让用户用数据做选择。

提交收录 →